




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crashing in Canadian Energy Trusts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1stMillionAt33.com/2006/11/crashing-in-canadian-energy-trusts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1stMillionAt33.com/2006/11/crashing-in-canadian-energy-trusts/</link>
	<description>A site to share my tips, tools, and humble thoughts on the journey to wealth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frugal</title>
		<link>http://www.1stMillionAt33.com/2006/11/crashing-in-canadian-energy-trusts/comment-page-1/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Frugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stMillionAt33.com/2006/11/crashing-in-canadian-energy-trusts/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>I believe the stocks have fallen almost enough.  But I could be wrong.  In any case, the risk of my investment is covered slightly thru the higher yields.  So if things don&#039;t work out, at least holding them 1/2 year should give you back 10%/20% of your money.

I think a fall of 15% is roughly fully reflecting the tax effect that will be effective 4 years from now (2011).

In the meantime of these 4 years, it is possible that this law be reversed or partially reversed.  But I don&#039;t hold out the hope for it.

Maybe I&#039;m buying too soon as you said.  I think the real problem is contagious fall and pulling out of capital.  Otherwise, fundamentally the price should already be close to fully corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the stocks have fallen almost enough.  But I could be wrong.  In any case, the risk of my investment is covered slightly thru the higher yields.  So if things don&#8217;t work out, at least holding them 1/2 year should give you back 10%/20% of your money.</p>
<p>I think a fall of 15% is roughly fully reflecting the tax effect that will be effective 4 years from now (2011).</p>
<p>In the meantime of these 4 years, it is possible that this law be reversed or partially reversed.  But I don&#8217;t hold out the hope for it.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m buying too soon as you said.  I think the real problem is contagious fall and pulling out of capital.  Otherwise, fundamentally the price should already be close to fully corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rags2riches</title>
		<link>http://www.1stMillionAt33.com/2006/11/crashing-in-canadian-energy-trusts/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>rags2riches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stMillionAt33.com/2006/11/crashing-in-canadian-energy-trusts/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Wow, it is pretty amazing that a country with a developed economy can have such large loopholes in their tax laws, and the closure of those loopholes can cause such turmoil in their financial markets. 

I guess you are buying more because the proposal may not become law? Because if it does become law, this is probably just the beginning of the slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it is pretty amazing that a country with a developed economy can have such large loopholes in their tax laws, and the closure of those loopholes can cause such turmoil in their financial markets. </p>
<p>I guess you are buying more because the proposal may not become law? Because if it does become law, this is probably just the beginning of the slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

